Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Mar;469(3):768-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1564-5.

Child abuse and the legal system: the orthopaedic surgeon's role in diagnosis.

Author information

  • 1University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC3079, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. csulliva@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Orthopaedic surgeons have unique training and experience in diagnosis of fractures, both accidental and nonaccidental. That experience is valuable in identifying physical child abuse and in avoiding false accusations or convictions. Both aspects are important to the welfare of children and their families. The events that follow a report of child abuse are outside the training and experience of most orthopaedic surgeons.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES:

What process follows a report of suspected child abuse? What unexpected outcomes or results occur in this process? Are medical conclusions used in this process consistent with the state of our knowledge?

METHODS:

The child abuse legal process is described as experienced by one orthopaedic surgeon. Examples of unexpected problems that occurred in cases that went to trial are described.

CONCLUSIONS:

Inappropriate outcomes can result from incomplete or incorrectly applied information. The input of the orthopaedic surgeon is often needed to provide the best information available to ensure that the best interests of the child and the family are protected. Working within a hospital team is the preferred method, but direct courtroom testimony is sometimes necessary.

PMID:
20848241
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC3032855
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk