Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Heart Rhythm. 2010 Dec;7(12):1852-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.09.006. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

    Proarrhythmic risk of embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte transplantation in infarcted myocardium.

    Source

    Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    Cellular replacement strategies using embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and their cardiac derivatives are emerging as novel experimental therapeutic paradigms for the treatment of post-myocardial infarction (MI) left ventricular (LV) dysfunction; however, their potential proarrhythmic risk remains unclear.

    OBJECTIVE:

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the functional effect and proarrhythmic risk of ESC transplantation in a mouse model of MI.

    METHODS:

    We compared the functional effects and proarrhythmic risk of direct intramyocardial transplantation of 3 × 10(5) undifferentiated mouse ESCs (MI+ESC group, n = 33) and mouse ESC-derived cardiomyocytes (MI+ESC-CM group, n = 40) versus culture medium (MI group, n = 33) at the infarct border zone in a mouse model of acute MI. LV performance was assessed with serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1 and 3 week(s) post-MI, and invasive LV pressure measurement was assessed (dP/dt) at 4 weeks before sacrifice for histological examination. Furthermore, electrophysiological study was also performed in another set of animals in each group (n = 24) to assess for proarrhythmias after transplantation.

    RESULTS:

    In vitro cellular electrophysiological study demonstrated that ESC-CMs exhibit arrhythmogenesis including automaticity, lengthened action potential duration, and depolarized resting membrane potential. At 4 weeks, the MI+ESC-CM group (21/40, 53%) had a higher mortality rate compared with those in the MI group (10/33, 30%, P = .08) and in the MI+ESC group (7/33, 21%, P = .012). Electrophysiological study showed a significantly higher incidence of inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the MI+ESC-CM group (13/24, 54%) compared with in the MI group (6/24, 21%, P = .039) and in the MI+ESC group (5/24, 21%, P = .017). Cardiac MRI showed similar improvement in LV ejection fraction in the MI+ESC and MI+ESC-CM groups compared with in the MI group at 1 week (27.5% ± 3.8%; 30.3% ± 5.2% vs. 12.4% ± 1.4%; P < .05) and 3 weeks (29.8% ± 3.9%; 27.0% ± 4.8% vs. 10.6% ± 2.8%; P < .05) post-MI, respectively. Furthermore, invasive hemodynamic assessment at 4 weeks showed significant similar improvement in LV +dP/dt in the MI+ESC (2,644 ± 391 mmHg/s, P < .05) and MI+ESC-CM groups (2,539 ± 389 mmHg/s; P < .05) compared with in the MI group (2,042 ± 406 mmHg/s).

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Our results demonstrate that transplantation of undifferentiated ESCs and ESC-CMs provides similar improvement in cardiac function post-MI. However, transplantation of ESC-CMs is associated with a significantly higher prevalence of inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias and early mortality than transplantations with ESCs.

    Copyright © 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

    Comment in

    PMID:
    20833268
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk