Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Nephrol. 2010;32(4):305-10. doi: 10.1159/000319461. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

Implantable defibrillators improve survival in end-stage renal disease: results from a multi-center registry.

Author information

  • 1Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ont., Canada. shiremath@toh.on.ca

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Small retrospective analyses suggest that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients do not obtain as much of a survival benefit from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) as non-ESRD patients do. We aimed to assess the survival effect of an ICD in ESRD patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

METHODS:

Data from two registries identified ESRD patients with an ICD and ESRD patients with left ventricular dysfunction (defined as ejection fraction <0.35). Cox proportional hazards regression was performed, including certain predefined covariates to assess the effect of an ICD on survival.

RESULTS:

Overall survival in the full cohort was a median of 4.7 years with 20 deaths in the ICD group and 29 deaths in the no-ICD group. The median survival in the ICD group was 8.0 years and 3.1 years in the no-ICD group. Crude analysis showed a better survival in the ICD group as compared to the no-ICD group (p = 0.016). The multivariable analysis confirmed that the ICD group had significantly less all-cause mortality compared to the no-ICD group (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.82; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION:

An ICD is associated with a higher survival in ESRD patients with left ventricular dysfunction. This result merits further study in a larger cohort of patients.

Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PMID:
20714135
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for S. Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk