Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Nov;29(9):999-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Aug 1.

Incomplete documentation of elements of Ottawa Ankle Rules despite an electronic medical record.

Author information

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus OH 43201, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The purpose of the study was to observe the frequency of complete documentation of the elements of the Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) in acute foot and ankle injuries in an emergency department with an electronic medical record.

PROCEDURE:

Seven hundred patient visits for acute ankle/foot injuries were reviewed. Each component of the OAR was tabulated as positive, negative, or not documented. Radiograph ordering and results were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated.

MAIN FINDINGS:

Of the 700 charts evaluated, 663 received a radiograph, with 138 fractures identified. The OAR components were completely documented in 288 subjects (41%; 95% confidence interval, 37%-45%). One hundred percent of the charts documented weight-bearing status (template provided), but less than 0.5% (n = 3) documented a navicular examination (not mentioned on the template).

CONCLUSION:

Incomplete documentation of examination components is common, even with prompting from an electronic medical record. This engenders both medicolegal risk and an inability to perform quality analyses to minimize unnecessary radiograph use.

Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
20674227
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk