J Nucl Med. 2010 Aug;51(8):1174-81. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

Correlation between glycolytic phenotype and tumor grade in soft-tissue sarcomas by 18F-FDG PET.

Benz MR, Dry SM, Eilber FC, Allen-Auerbach MS, Tap WD, Elashoff D, Phelps ME, Czernin J.

Source

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany.

Abstract

Tumor glycolytic phenotyping can be accomplished with (18)F-FDG PET. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake correlates with tumor grade in several cancers. However, the role of (18)F-FDG PET for the grading of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) warrants further research.

METHODS:

One hundred two patients (48 men and 54 women; mean age +/- SD, 50 +/- 17 y) with 12 STS subtypes underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT before treatment. Tumor (18)F-FDG uptake, expressed as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), was compared among subtypes and correlated with histopathologic grade. Two frequently used sarcoma grading systems--the 3-tier system of the French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer [FNCLCC]) and a 2-tier system (low grade vs. high grade)--were used.

RESULTS:

More than 90% of STSs (93/102) exhibited a strong glycolytic phenotype (SUVmax, 2.7-52.2 g/mL). Tumor SUVmax differed significantly among tumor grades (P < 0.001 for the 3- and 2-tier grading systems). The FNCLCC and 2-tier grading systems predicted tumor grade with similar accuracy (area under the curve, 0.83 and 0.85, respectively; P = 0.35). SUVmax differed significantly among histologic subtypes (P = 0.03) in the entire population but not when high-grade STSs were analyzed separately (P = 0.31).

CONCLUSION:

The tumor glycolytic phenotype correlated significantly with histologic grade as determined by both the FNCLCC and 2-tier (high vs. low) grading systems. (18)F-FDG PET cannot be used to reliably distinguish among grade 2 and 3 STSs (by FNCLCC) and the various subtypes.