Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    J Soc Psychol. 2010 May-Jun;150(3):301-18. doi: 10.1080/00224540903365414.

    Physical attractiveness biases in ratings of employment suitability: tracking down the "beauty is beastly" effect.

    Source

    University of Colorado, Denver, School of Business, P.O. Box 173364, Campus Box 165, Denver, CO 80217, USA. stefanie.johnson@ucdenver.edu

    Abstract

    The "what is beautiful is good" heuristic suggests that physically attractive persons benefit from their attractiveness in a large range of situations, including perceptions of employment suitability. Conversely, the "beauty is beastly" effect suggests that attractiveness can be detrimental to women in certain employment contexts, although these findings have been less consistent than those for the "what is beautiful is good" effect. The current research seeks to uncover situations in which beauty might be detrimental for female applicants. In two studies, we found that attractiveness can be detrimental for women applying for masculine sex-typed jobs for which physical appearance is perceived as unimportant.

    PMID:
    20575336
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk