Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Aug 1;37(8):777-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01577.x. Epub 2010 Jun 10.

An economic evaluation of different sinus lift techniques.

Author information

  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. stefan.listl@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To identify the most cost-effective approach to sinus lifting on the basis of currently available evidence.

METHODS:

We incorporate the costs and clinical outcomes of nine different sinus lift techniques within a decision tree model in which costs are based on insurance regulations in Germany and health outcomes follow two recent meta-analyses. The most cost-effective treatment option is identified on the basis of the maximum net benefit criterion. Uncertainties regarding health outcomes are incorporated via probabilistic sensitivity analysis based on Monte-Carlo simulation.

RESULTS:

When there are no financial restrictions, the optimum treatment strategy is the lateral approach with autogenous particulate bone and a resorbable membrane. When, however, monetary resources for sinus-floor elevation are scarce, the most cost-effective option is the transalveolar technique without bone grafting. Only if relatively high costs can be afforded or if initial bone height at implant site is below 5 mm is the maximum net benefit achieved by lateral approaches.

CONCLUSIONS:

On the basis of currently available evidence, the transalveolar technique is advisable when monetary resources for sinus-floor elevation are scarce and initial bone height is sufficiently high. Lateral approaches are primarily recommended for lower pre-operative bone heights.

PMID:
20546083
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk