Display Settings:


Send to:

Choose Destination
J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Jul;24(7):1804-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e06e27.

Efficacy of potentiation of performance through overweight implement throws on male and female high-school weight throwers.

Author information

  • 1School of Physical Education, Sport, and Exercise Science, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA. lwjudge@bsu.edu


The purpose of the investigation was to determine the acute effects of heavy implements on weight throw performance. Ten high-school weight throwers were recruited to participate. A within-subjects design was used to compare the difference between mean and peak distances achieved with the regulation weight after warm-up with regulation weight (control), 1.37-kg overweight (OVRWGHT1) and 2.27-kg overweight implement (OVRWGHT2). Analysis via repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed main effects for Treatment (p = 0.021) and Attempt (p = 0.015). The mean after the OVRWGHT1 treatment was the highest (14.52 +/- 3.54 m) followed by OVRWGHT2 (14.22 +/- 3.15 m) and the competition weight implement (STAND; 13.38 +/- 2.98). Paired samples t-test for peak distance by treatment revealed that both OVRWGHT1 (p = 0.004) and OVRWGHT2 (p = 0.027) were significantly different from STAND. Post hoc testing revealed that both OVRWGHT1 (p = 0.025) and OVRWGHT2 (p = 0.007) resulted in a significant difference in perceived fatigue compared with STAND. The results suggest that using overweight implements as part of the warm-up may improve performance in high-school athletes.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk