Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jun;196(6):434-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066217.

Efficacy of atypical v. typical antipsychotics in the treatment of early psychosis: meta-analysis.

Author information

  • 1Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry PO 67, De Crespigny Park, London SE58AF. nicolas.crossley@kcl.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There is an ongoing debate about the use of atypical antipsychotics as a first-line treatment for first-episode psychosis.

AIMS:

To examine the evidence base for this recommendation.

METHOD:

Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials in the early phase of psychosis, looking at long-term discontinuation rates, short-term symptom changes, weight gain and extrapyramidal side-effects. Trials were identified using a combination of electronic (Cochrane Central, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO) and manual searches.

RESULTS:

Fifteen randomised controlled trials with a total of 2522 participants were included. No significant differences between atypical and typical drugs were found for discontinuation rates (odds ratio (OR) = 0.7, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.2) or effect on symptoms (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -0.1, 95% CI -0.2 to 0.02). Participants on atypical antipsychotics gained 2.1 kg (95% CI 0.1 to 4.1) more weight than those on typicals, whereas those on typicals experienced more extrapyramidal side-effects (SMD = -0.4, 95% CI -0.5 to -0.2).

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no evidence for differences in efficacy between atypical and typical antipsychotics, but there was a clear difference in the side-effect profile.

PMID:
20513851
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2878818
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk