Structural comparison of reduced, substrate-bound, and oxidized S. aureus fRMsrs. A, stereoscopic views showing comparison of overall structures of reduced, substrate-bound, and oxidized S. aureus fRMsrs. The backbone models for reduced (fRMsrred), substrate-bound (fRMsrsub), and oxidized (fRMsrox) forms are shown in green, light blue, and light yellow, respectively. B and C, comparison of active sites between fRMsrred (green) and fRMsrsub (light blue). The active site residues of fRMsrred and fRMsrsub are superimposed (B), and those of fRMsrred are independently shown (C). In C, hydrogen bond interactions among water molecules and active site residues are indicated by dotted lines. D, comparison of active sites between fRMsrsub (light blue) and fRMsrox (light yellow). The active site residues of fRMsrsub and fRMsrox are superimposed. E, comparison of active sites between fRMsrred (green) and fRMsrox (light yellow). The active site residues of fRMsrred and fRMsrox are superimposed. The disulfide bond between Cys68 and Cys102 in fRMsrox is represented by a yellow stick, and substrate Met-R-O in fRMsrsub is shown by a light green stick. F, conformational changes of fRMsrred, fRMsrsub, and fRMsrox. The active site is shown with electrostatic surface models. The surfaces are colored according to the electrostatic potentials from −21 kiloteslas/e (red) to +21 kiloteslas/e (blue). The electrostatic surface potentials were calculated by using APBS (37).