Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.01.001.

Comparison of open and minimally invasive thymectomies at a single institution.

Author information

  • 1Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, 1101 Madison St., Suite 850, Seattle, WA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Most thymectomies are performed via sternotomy. Minimally invasive thymectomy (MIT) has been described but its potential benefits and drawbacks remain unclear.

METHODS:

A retrospective chart review comparing thymectomies performed via sternotomy to MIT at a single institution between 2005 and 2009.

RESULTS:

Eight patients underwent MIT and 8 patients underwent sternotomy in the management of myasthenia gravis, thymic hyperplasia, or small thymic tumors. There was 1 perioperative death unrelated to the surgical procedure and no morbidity. The surgical time, estimated blood loss, and chest tube output was similar in both groups. The average hospital stay for MIT was 2.4 days compared with 4.3 days for sternotomy. One MIT patient remained on narcotic pain medication 2 weeks after surgery compared with 6 in the open group.

CONCLUSIONS:

MIT can be performed with similar morbidity and efficacy as transsternal thymectomy. Patients require fewer narcotics and can be discharged earlier.

Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
20466100
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk