In vivo oncolytic activity of Ad5-RV004.21 virus. Tumor xenograft model using C4-2 prostate cancer cells were injected at a density of 1 × 106 cells into the dorsal rear flank region of the athymic nude mice to examine the efficacy of Ad5-RV004 or Ad5-RV004.21 viruses. Equal number of infectious viruses, that is, 1 × 108 plaque forming units/tumor of either CN702 (wild type), Ad5-RV004.21, Ad5-RV004, Ad5-RV002-F-Luc virus, or mock infection (phosphate-buffered saline) were administered on day 1, 4 and 7 and measured every other day for 38 days. There was a significant difference between the tumor volumes in animals that were treated with wild type CN702 virus and Ad-RV004 virus (P<0.05); however, no significant difference was observed in CN702 vs Ad5-RV004.21-treated animals (P>0.05) (a). Kaplan–Meier plot showing survival of mice bearing s.c. C4-2 tumor xenografts treated intra-tumorally with different viruses (CN702, Ad5-RV004, Ad5-RV004.21 or Ad5-002-F-Luc) or PBS. Animals were killed when tumor area was ≥2.0cm2. A median survival vs time was evaluated using a log-rank test (P<0.05). All mock-treated groups (Ad5–RV002-F–Luc or PBS) did not survive beyond 60 days of treatment. Animals treated with CN702 (wild-type virus) had 100% survival, whereas 40% of the Ad5-RV004 (n=5) and 85% of Ad5-RV004.21-treated animals survived beyond 100 days of treatment. There was a significant difference in the survival of the PBS-treated mocks vs the three Ad5-RV004, Ad5-RV004.21 and CN702 viral treatment groups, or Ad5-RV002-F.Luc Control virus vs CN702 or Ad5-RV004.21-treated animals. However, no statistical difference was observed between the Ad5-RV002-F.Luc controls-treated group vs Ad5-RV004-treated animals (b). *P<0.05.