Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 May-Jun;17(3):265-73. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004333.

Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review.

Author information

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt Implementation Sciences Laboratory, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8340, USA. kim.unertl@vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

The objective of this review was to describe methods used to study and model workflow. The authors included studies set in a variety of industries using qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. Of the 6221 matching abstracts, 127 articles were included in the final corpus. The authors collected data from each article on researcher perspective, study type, methods type, specific methods, approaches to evaluating quality of results, definition of workflow and dependent variables. Ethnographic observation and interviews were the most frequently used methods. Long study durations revealed the large time commitment required for descriptive workflow research. The most frequently discussed technique for evaluating quality of study results was triangulation. The definition of the term "workflow" and choice of methods for studying workflow varied widely across research areas and researcher perspectives. The authors developed a conceptual framework of workflow-related terminology for use in future research and present this model for use by other researchers.

PMID:
20442143
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2995718
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (3)Free text

Figure 3
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk