Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.12.008.

A critical appraisal of the SPRINT trial.

Author information

  • 1Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. helfetd@hss.edu

Abstract

The Study to Prospectively evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Tibial fractures (SPRINT) was a randomized controlled trial to evaluate rates of reoperation and complications resulting from reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The trial found a possible benefit for reamed intramedullary nailing in patients with closed tibial fractures, but no difference was found between the 2 approaches in patients with open fractures. This article is a review and critique of the methodology used in the SPRINT trial. Numerous aspects of the trial's design served to greatly reduce the potential bias, producing sound and reliable results. Overall, the SPRINT trial should provide recommendations for change in clinical practice and also set a benchmark for the conduct of randomized controlled trials in orthopedic surgery.

Copyright 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.

PMID:
20399363
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk