Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Biotechniques. 2010 Mar;48(3):197-209. doi: 10.2144/000113382.

    Antibody validation.

    Source

    Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

    Erratum in

    • Biotechniques. 2010 May;48(5):351.

    Abstract

    Antibodies are among the most frequently used tools in basic science research and in clinical assays, but there are no universally accepted guidelines or standardized methods for determining the validity of these reagents. Furthermore, for commercially available antibodies, it is clear that what is on the label does not necessarily correspond to what is in the tube. To validate an antibody, it must be shown to be specific, selective, and reproducible in the context for which it is to be used. In this review, we highlight the common pitfalls when working with antibodies, common practices for validating antibodies, and levels of commercial antibody validation for seven vendors. Finally, we share our algorithm for antibody validation for immunohistochemistry and quantitative immunofluorescence.

    PMID:
    20359301
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free full text

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Informa Healthcare, USA

      Save items

      Recent activity

      • Antibody validation.
        Antibody validation.
        Biotechniques. 2010 Mar ;48(3):197-209. doi: 10.2144/000113382.
        PubMed

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk