Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Adv Urol. 2009:818065. doi: 10.1155/2009/818065. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

Modalities for imaging of prostate cancer.

Author information

  • 1Division of Urology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, UCDSOM, MS C-319, Academic Office One Bldg., 12631 East 17th Ave., Room L15-5602, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. amy.hou@ucdenver.edu

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer deaths among males in the United States. Prostate screening by digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen has shifted the diagnosis of prostate cancer to lower grade, organ confined disease, adding to overdetection and overtreatment of prostate cancer. The new challenge is in differentiating clinically relevant tumors from ones that may otherwise never have become evident if not for screening. The rapid evolution of imaging modalities and the synthesis of anatomic, functional, and molecular data allow for improved detection and characterization of prostate cancer. However, the appropriate use of imaging is difficult to define, as many controversial studies regarding each of the modalities and their utilities can be found in the literature. Clinical practice patterns have been slow to adopt many of these advances as a result. This review discusses the more established imaging techniques, including Ultrasonography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MR Spectroscopy, Computed Tomography, and Positron Emission Tomography. We also review several promising techniques on the horizon, including Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI, Diffuse-Weighted Imaging, Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles, and Radionuclide Scintigraphy.

PMID:
20339583
[PubMed]
PMCID:
PMC2841248
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Hindawi Publishing Corporation Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk