Positions of the root and endosymbionts among the Enterobacteriales. (A) Two root positions (Plu and Eco) were obtained in our study; positions taken by A+T-rich endosymbionts (O and S) and two tested intermediate root positions (Int1 and Int2) are marked. Esch., Escherichia; Salm., Salmonella; Enter., Enterobacter; lum., luminescens; outgp, outgroup. (B) Positions taken by endosymbionts and their effect on rooting. The full Enterobacteriales taxon set was reduced to a core by removing all eight A+T-rich genomes (retaining the two outgroups), then each alone, or in groups of four, was added back to the data set. The compositionally unbiased endosymbiont Sodalis was excluded or not, and either the full set of Entero protein families (Fams) (part i) or subsets with at least one outgroup and favoring either the Plu-root (part ii) or the Eco-root (part iii) were used. The resulting root position and the position taken by the tested endosymbiont is reported. *, bootstrap analysis was performed for these trees, with support measuring 100% for every node. Bau., Ca. Baumannia; Blo. or Bloch., Ca. Blochmannia; Wig., Wigglesworthia; florid., floridanus; penn., pennsylvanicus. (C) Intermediate root positions disfavored. Each of the 696 protein families containing all core taxa and both outgroups were tested for preference of four hypothetical root positions using the P value of the Approximately Unbiased test (pAU), and pAU is reported for the supermatrix (Supermtx) that combined these 696 protein families. A pAU of <0.05 is typically taken as a rejection. (D) Identifying Photorhabdus as a disruptive taxon. For each of the 696 Entero families used in panel C, the indicated core taxa were singly omitted and pAU was taken for either the Plu-Root or Eco-Root topology, to determine the topology favored by the family; pAU was also taken for the two topologies based on the corresponding supermatrix.