Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;196(3):173-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066001.

Efficacy of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychological treatments for adult depression: meta-analytic study of publication bias.

Author information

  • 1Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.cuijpers@psy.vu.nl

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

It is not clear whether the effects of cognitive-behavioural therapy and other psychotherapies have been overestimated because of publication bias.

AIMS:

To examine indicators of publication bias in randomised controlled trials of psychotherapy for adult depression.

METHOD:

We examined effect sizes of 117 trials with 175 comparisons between psychotherapy and control conditions. As indicators of publication bias we examined funnel plots, calculated adjusted effect sizes after publication had been taken into account using Duval & Tweedie's procedure, and tested the symmetry of the funnel plots using the Begg & Mazumdar rank correlation test and Egger's test.

RESULTS:

The mean effect size was 0.67, which was reduced after adjustment for publication bias to 0.42 (51 imputed studies). Both Begg & Mazumbar's test and Egger's test were highly significant (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression seem to be overestimated considerably because of publication bias.

PMID:
20194536
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk