Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010 Mar;19(3):561-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1411.

From concept to practice: reflections on the preconception health agenda.

Author information

  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7516, USA. mkmoos@med.unc.edu

Abstract

Interest in preconceptional healthcare was advanced by release of the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and its Select Panel on Preconception Care in 2006. With increasing interest, apprehension surfaced from healthcare professionals, women, and the public at large. The most common themes of concerns are that an emphasis on preconception care is pronatalist, unnecessary, exclusive of men, framed too narrowly, doomed to failure because of competing clinical demands and influences, and involves a vocabulary that is meaningless to the public. This article explores the themes and argues that none of them are fatal to moving forward with a preconception agenda-rather, they should stimulate thoughtful response, careful framing, and vigilance for unintended consequences related to restructuring the basic perinatal prevention paradigm from a prenatal care approach to a women's wellness model.

PMID:
20184531
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk