Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Biopharm Stat. 2009 Sep;19(5):872-88. doi: 10.1080/10543400903105406.

Last observation carried forward: a crystal ball?

Author information

  • 1Medical Statistics Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

Abstract

In spite of widespread criticism and notwithstanding the availability of flexible, broadly valid, and conveniently implemented methods like direct-likelihood and direct-Bayesian analyses, last observation carried forward (LOCF), baseline observation carried forward (BOCF), and complete case analysis remain popular for handling incomplete clinical trial data. To the well-known criticisms toward LOCF and BOCF, namely, that they can be either conservative or liberal depending on the context, that they can violate the intention-to-treat principle, and so on, we add that, with the exception of certain degenerate and unrealistic special cases, these methods are incompatible with the sensible requirement that the mechanism governing dropout be independent of future, unobserved measurements, given covariates, past observed measurements, and the current possibly missing measurement.

PMID:
20183449
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk