Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Occup Environ Health. 2010 Jan-Mar;16(1):89-96.

Inadequate toxicity tests of food additive acesulfame.

Author information

  • 1Drexel University, School of Public Health, Philadelphia, USA. myrakarstadt@verizon.net

Erratum in

  • Int J Occup Environ Health. 2010 Apr-Jun;16(2):112.

Abstract

Despite poor-quality toxicity tests, acesulfame potassium was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use as an artificial sweetener. At present, acesulfame is very widely used, most frequently in blends with the most popular artificial sweetener in the US, sucralose (Splenda). Acesulfame was nominated twice (in 1996 and again in 2006) for testing in the National Toxicology Program (NTP) bioassay program. Both nominations were rejected by NTP. Rather than carry out bioassays, NTP subjected acesulfame to tests in genetically modified mice (GMM). Those GMM tests yielded results that provided no insight into potential carcinogenicity of acesulfame. It is possible that FDA discouraged NTP from conducting bioassays of acesulfame. Acesulfame should be tested in the bioassay program as soon as possible, and steps should be taken to ensure the objectivity of the bioassay nomination process.

PMID:
20166324
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Taylor & Francis
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk