In vivo interaction of wtHspB8 and muHspB8 species with Ddx20. a HEK293T cells grown on coverslips were doubly transfected with vector cDNA of Xpress-tagged Ddx20 (construct 5) and FLAG-tagged wtHspB8 (construct 9), K141EHspB8 (construct 10), or K141NHspB8 (construct 11), as indicated. Twenty-four hours later, cells were fixed and processed for immunostaining. In the selected cells, expressed Ddx20 (red) and all HspB8 species (green) showed a relatively even distribution in the cytoplasm (co-localization in yellow). For comparison, nuclei of the same cells stained with DAPI are shown. The bar indicates 50 μM. b HEK293T cells grown on glass bottom culture plates were doubly transfected with vector cDNA of CIT-tagged Ddx20 (construct 12) and CFP-tagged wtHspB8 (construct 13), K141EHspB8 (construct 14), or K141NHspB8 (construct 15), or with control vectors, as indicated. Ten hours later, in vivo images of selected cells with relatively even cytoplasmic distribution of the expressed proteins were collected. Such cells were used for the qFRET analysis as shown in (d). c SDS-PAGE/Western blotting of the cells as shown in (b). For visualization of the HspB8-CFP species, an anti-GFP antibody was used. For visualization of the Ddx20-CIT, an anti-Ddx20 antibody was used which detected also the endogenous Ddx20 (control lane). Note that the transfected cells contained similar amounts of wtHspB8-CFP, K141EHspB8-CFP, and K141NHspB8-CFP (left panel), and also similar amounts of Ddx20-CIT (right panel). The positions of molecular mass marker proteins are indicated. d AAFE values for the interactions of Ddx20 with wtHspB8, K141EHspB8, and K141NHspB8 as determined by the qFRET method. The used cells and constructs were as in (b). One-way ANOVA analysis revealed significant differences between the four groups, control 1, wtHspB8, K141EHspB8, and K141NHspB8 [F(5, 234) = 269.25; P < 0.001]. Post-hoc pairwise group comparisons showed significant differences between the sample values and the control (P < 0.001), between K141NHspB8 and wtHspB8 (P < 0.001), and between K141NHspB8 and K141EHspB8 (P < 0.001). By this method, no significant difference between K141EHspB8 and wtHspB8 (P = 0.099) was revealed, while the direct comparison between both sample groups by the Student’s t test indicated a significant difference (P = 0.033)