Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychiatr Serv. 2010 Feb;61(2):180-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.61.2.180.

Rational protection of subjects in research and quality improvement activities.

Author information

  • 1Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Detroit, USA. bgold0914@comcast.net

Abstract

This Open Forum illuminates shortcomings with the basis for determining degree of oversight of health services research and quality improvement activities. Using a federally regulated definition of research rather than a direct appraisal of risk to patients can misallocate effort from activities with higher risk for patients to those with lower risk. The case of the Johns Hopkins multicenter study of central line safety checklists in intensive care units is cited. Definitions of research promulgated by the Office of Human Research Protection are reviewed, and an alternative model based on patient risk is proposed. Suggestions for how quality improvement work fits into the larger paradigm of research are made.

PMID:
20123824
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk