Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.003.

Reliability of a procedural checklist as a high-stakes measurement of advanced technical skill.

Author information

  • 1Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Neville House, Boston, MA 02115, USA. speyre@partners.org

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of a previously validated laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication procedural checklist as a measurement of advanced technical skill.

METHODS:

Five surgeons, using a 65-step procedural checklist, independently evaluated 2 video recordings of expert surgeon operative performances of a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Results were analyzed for percent agreement and Fleiss kappa correlation for each operation independently and combined as a whole.

RESULTS:

Sixty-four of the 65 steps had 80% or higher percent agreement for both operative case A and B independently and when considered overall. The Fleiss kappa coefficients for operative case A (kappa = .95) and operative case B (kappa = .96) and overall (operative case A + B) (kappa = .95).

CONCLUSION:

The percentage agreement and kappa coefficients for all 3 analyses indicate a high degree of reliability (>.80) that would support the use of this instrument for high-stakes assessment of a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk