Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Am J Surg. 2010 Jun;199(6):759-64. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.017. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of internal versus external drainage with pancreaticojejunostomy for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Author information

  • 1Second Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 641-8510, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

A stent often is placed across the pancreaticojejunostomy. However, there is no report compared between internal drainage and external drainage.

METHODS:

We conducted a prospective randomized trial (NCT00628186 registered at http://ClinicalTrials.gov) with 100 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and we compared the effects on postoperative course.

RESULTS:

The incidence of pancreatic fistula according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula criteria was not different (external, 20%; vs internal, 26%), and the incidence of the other complications was similar between stent types. The median postoperative hospital stay was 21 days (range, 8-163 d) in the internal drainage group, which was shorter than the median stay of 24 days (range, 21-88 d) in the external drainage group (P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS:

Both internal drainage and external drainage were safety devices for pancreaticojejunostomy. Internal drainage simplifies postoperative managements and it might shorten postoperative stay for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PMID:
20074698
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk