Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Generate a file for use with external citation management software.
Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA. rodríguezj@boystown.org
This study tested the hypothesis that suppression contributes to the difference between simultaneous masking (SM) and forward masking (FM). To obtain an alternative estimate of suppression, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured in the presence of a suppressor tone. Psychophysical-masking and DPOAE-suppression measurements were made in 22 normal-hearing subjects for a 4000-Hz signal/f(2) and two masker/suppressor frequencies: 2141 and 4281 Hz. Differences between SM and FM at the same masker level were used to provide a psychophysical estimate of suppression. The increase in L(2) to maintain a constant output (L(d)) provided a DPOAE estimate of suppression for a range of suppressor levels. The similarity of the psychophysical and DPOAE estimates for the two masker/suppressor frequencies suggests that the difference in amount of masking between SM and FM is at least partially due to suppression.
Images from this publication.See all images (8) Free text
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on