Figure 2Effect of 1,25D and LCA on the interaction of VDR and β-catenin, transcriptional activity of β-catenin and endogenous DKK-4 expression
A. Representative graph of mammalian two hybrid assay utilizing Caco-2 cells to assess the effect of 1,25D and LCA on the interaction of VDR and β-catenin. Caco-2 cells were transfected with VDR prey, β-catenin bait, and then treated with vehicle (−1,25D), 10−8 M 1,25D or 70 μM LCA. Cells were then lysed and subjected to luciferase assay. VDR and β-catenin interaction was measured as firefly luciferase output (RLUs). Error bars indicate standard deviation. In the presence of 1,25D, interaction between VDR and β-catenin was increased 12-fold, while LCA increased the association by 8-fold (P-value for ANOVA = 0.0001; after Tukey’s HSD all pairwise comparisons remained statistically significant at a 99% confidence level).
B. TOPFlash assay measuring the effect of VDR on β-catenin transcriptional activity. HT29 cells were transfected the indicated amounts of exogenous F/M4 VDR, as well as human β-catenin and the TOPFlash vector. Cells were treated with vehicle −1,25D) or 10−9 M 1,25D for 24 hours prior to cell lysis and luciferase assay. Transcriptional activity was measured as firefly luciferase light output. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Using regression analyses, a statistically significant dose-response trend for suppression of beta-catenin activity with increasing VDR in the presence of ligand was observed (P-trend = 0.0001).
C. Representative graph of the TOPFlash assay in Caco-2 cells transfected with F/M4 VDR, TOPFlash vector, and β-catenin. Cells were treated with vehicle (−1,25D), 10−8 M 1,25D or 70 μM LCA and β-catenin transcriptional activity was measured as firefly luciferase output. Error bars indicate standard deviation. ANOVA reveals suppression of β-catenin activity at 25 ng VDR by 1,25-D but not LCA (* P = 0.04; though pairwise comparisons are not statistically significant after employing Tukey’s HSD). At 150 ng VDR, LCA was less effective at inhibiting β-catenin transactivation as compared to 1,25D (30%; ** P = 0.019 and 97%; P = 0.001), respectively; pairwise comparisons remained significant after Tukey’s HSD.
D. Quantitative RT-PCR to evaluate the effect of 1,25D and LCA on DKK-4 expression in Caco-2. Cells were transfected with 0 ng, 600 ng wild-type VDR, or 600 ng DNA-binding mutant VDR, and treated with either vehicle or 10−7 M 1,25D (bars left of dashed line), or with vehicle, 10−7 M 1,25D, or 70 μM LCA (bars right of dashed line) 24 hours prior to RNA extraction. PCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast. Expression was normalized to GAPDH endogenous control. Fold change was determined by comparing ligand treated samples to the vehicle treated sample for that transfection group. The reference group is assigned a value of one. All statistical analyses were student’s t-tests. * P = 0.001 when comparing the −1,25D and +1,25D groups that did not receive exogenous VDR. Cells with mutant and wildtype VDR demonstrated similar DKK-4 expression (P = 0.0004 for both M4 and mutant VDR). Data in all panels are representative of 3 independent experiments with triplicate samples in each group.