Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Lung. 2010 Jun;188(3):259-62. doi: 10.1007/s00408-009-9207-x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.

Exhaled nitric oxide levels are elevated in persons with tetraplegia and comparable to that in mild asthmatics.

Author information

  • 1Rehabilitation Research and Development Center of Excellence for the Medical Consequences of Spinal Cord Injury, The James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Rm. 1E-02, 130 West Kingsbridge Road, Bronx, NY 10468, USA. Miroslav.Radulovic@va.gov

Abstract

The role of airway inflammation in mediating airflow obstruction in persons with chronic traumatic tetraplegia is unknown. Measurement of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) affords a validated noninvasive technique for gauging the airway inflammatory response in asthma, although it has never been assessed in persons with tetraplegia. This study was designed to determine the FeNO in individuals with chronic tetraplegia compared with that in patients with mild asthma and healthy able-bodied individuals. Nine subjects with chronic tetraplegia, seven subjects with mild asthma, and seven matched healthy able-bodied controls were included in this prospective, observational, pilot study. All subjects were nonsmokers and clinically stable at the time of study. Spirometry was performed on all participants at baseline. FENO was determined online by a commercially available closed circuit, chemiluminescence method, using a single-breath technique. Subjects with tetraplegia had significantly higher values of FeNO than controls (17.72 +/- 3.9 ppb vs. 10.37 +/- 4.9 ppb; P < or = 0.01), as did subjects with asthma (20.23 +/- 4.64 ppb vs. 10.37 +/- 4.9 ppb, P < or = 0.001). There was no significant difference in FeNO between subjects with tetraplegia and those with asthma (17.72 +/- 3.9 ppb vs. 20.23 +/- 4.64 ppb, P < or = 0.27). Individuals with chronic tetraplegia have FeNO levels that are comparable to that seen in mild asthmatics and higher than that in healthy able-bodied controls. The clinical relevance of this observation has yet to be determined.

PMID:
20012982
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Springer
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk