Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Apr;21(4):467-73. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

    Long-term results of vaginal repairs with and without xenograft reinforcement.

    Source

    Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 2730 Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark. lonemouritsen@newmail.dk

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS:

    The aim of this paper is to study if xenograft reinforcement of vaginal repair reduces recurrence of prolapse.

    METHODS:

    Results 1-5 years after vaginal repair were studied in 41 cases with xenograft and in 82 matched controls without. Symptoms were evaluated by a validated questionnaire and anatomy by pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ).

    RESULTS:

    Significant more cases, 97% versus 81% controls, felt cured or much improved (p = 0.02); 11% of cases and 19% of controls had POP symptoms, POPQ > -1 was found in 31% cases and 24% controls. Defining recurrence as POPQ > -1 plus symptoms revealed recurrence in 3% of cases and 12% controls. None of the recurrence rates was significantly different for cases versus controls. No vaginal erosions were seen. Previous surgery was a significant risk factor with odds ratio 7.3 for another recurrence.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Recurrence rates defined by POPQ plus symptoms were low compared to literature. Xenograft reinforcement might improve results.

    PMID:
    19998024
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC2977064
    Free PMC Article

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk