Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Cancer Causes Control. 2010 Mar;21(3):445-61. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9476-y. Epub 2009 Nov 28.

Predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer screening over time in 11 states.

Author information

  • 1RTI International, Durham, NC 27709-2194, USA. lmobley@rti.org

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

We study a cohort of Medicare-insured men and women aged 65+ in the year 2000, who lived in 11 states covered by Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries, to better understand various predictors of endoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

METHODS:

We use multilevel probit regression on two cross-sectional periods (2000-2002, 2003-2005) and include people diagnosed with breast cancer, CRC, or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and a reference sample without cancer.

RESULTS:

Men are not universally more likely to be screened than women, and African Americans, Native Americans, and Hispanics are not universally less likely to be screened than whites. Disparities decrease over time, suggesting that whites were first to take advantage of an expansion in Medicare benefits to cover endoscopic screening for CRC. Higher-risk persons had much higher utilization, while older persons and beneficiaries receiving financial assistance for Part B coverage had lower utilization and the gap widened over time.

CONCLUSIONS:

Screening for CRC in our Medicare-insured sample was less than optimal, and reasons varied considerably across states. Negative managed care spillovers were observed, demonstrating that policy interventions to improve screening rates should reflect local market conditions as well as population diversity.

PMID:
19946738
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2835730
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk