AEG-1 promotes angiogenesis. (A) AEG-1 induces tube formation on Matrigel through the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. HUVECs were infected with Ad.vec or Ad.AEG-1 (25 PFU/cell) in combination with Ad.DN.Akt (25 PFU/cell). One day after infection, cells (5 ×104), which were labeled with a fluorescent dye, calcein AM, were seeded onto Matrigel and tube formation was assayed after 16 h by fluorescence microscopy. Upper, cells that were infected with Ad.AEG-1 clearly showed an increase in tube formation on Matrigel (arrows), whereas the Ad.vec-treated cells were a poor inducer of tube-like structures (arrowheads). (Lower) Graphical presentation of tube formation assay, data expressed in the graph is the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. Ad.vec-infected cells; #, P < 0.05 vs. Ad.AEG-1-infected cells. (B) HUVECs were treated with either control siRNA or AEG-1 siRNA, plated on Matrigel and stimulated with VEGF (10 ng/mL). Tube formation was assayed after 16 h by fluorescence microscopy. *, P < 0.05 vs. control siRNA treated cells. (C) Inhibition of AEG-1 by siRNA inhibits angiogenesis in in vivo CAM assays. CAMs of 9-day-old chicken embryos were injected with either control siRNA or AEG-1 siRNA-transfected H4 glioma cells. Angiogenesis in yolk sac was monitored 1 week after inoculation, and representative fields were photographed. (D) HUVECs were infected with Ad.vec or Ad.AEG-1 (25 PFU/cell) in combination with Ad. DN.Akt (25 PFU/cell). One day after infection, cells (5 × 104) were seeded onto the upper chamber of a Matrigel invasion chamber system in the absence of serum. Twenty-four hours after seeding, the filters were fixed, stained, and photographed. (Right panel) Graphical representation of the invasion assay. The data expressed in the graph is the mean ± SE of three independent experiments. *, P < 0.05 vs. Ad.vec-infected cells, #P < 0.05 vs. Ad.AEG-1-infected cells.