Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Nurs Res. 2009 Nov-Dec;58(6):444-51. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181bf15fe.

Methodological issues in trials of complementary and alternative medicine interventions.

Author information

  • 1Department of Statistics and Probability, College of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. sikorska@stt.msu.edu

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is widespread among cancer patients. Information on safety and efficacy of CAM therapies is needed for both patients and healthcare providers. Well-designed randomized clinical trials of CAM therapy interventions can inform both clinical research and practice.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to review important issues that affect the design of randomized clinical trials for CAM interventions.

METHODS:

Using the methods component of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting Trials as a guiding framework and a National Cancer Institute-funded reflexology study as an exemplar, methodological issues related to participants, intervention, objectives, outcomes, sample size, randomization, blinding, and statistical methods were reviewed.

DISCUSSION:

Trials of CAM interventions designed and implemented according to appropriate methodological standards will facilitate the needed scientific rigor in CAM research. Interventions in CAM can be tested using proposed methodology, and the results of testing will inform nursing practice in providing safe and effective supportive care and in improving the well-being of patients.

PMID:
19918155
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2880328
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk