Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Am J Public Health. 2010 Jan;100(1):24-32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.153767.

    A decade of controversy: balancing policy with evidence in the regulation of prescription drug advertising.

    Source

    Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. froschd@pamfri.org

    Abstract

    Direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) of prescription drugs has remained controversial since regulations were liberalized by the Food and Drug Administration in 1997. We reviewed empirical evidence addressing the claims made in the policy debate for and against DTCA. This advertising has some benefits, but significant risks are evident as well, magnified by the prominence of DTCA in population-level health communications. To minimize potential harm and maximize the benefits of DTCA for population health, the quality and quantity of information should be improved to enable consumers to better self-identify whether treatment is indicated, more realistically appraise the benefits, and better attend to the risks associated with prescription drugs. We propose guidelines for improving the utility of prescription drug advertising.

    PMID:
    19910354
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC2791253
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

    FIGURE 1

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk