Cluster comparison of HCCA, MCL, k-means, and MCODE. A, Graph displaying the cluster size range (x axis) versus number of clusters (y axis; observations) for selected HCCA, MCL, k-means, and MCODE partitions of the HRR network (HRR cutoff = 30). B, Modularity scores for different settings for the HCCA, MCL, k-means, and MCODE algorithms. k-means 100, 200, and 400 represent desired cluster number parameters for k-means; MCL 1.15, 1.5, and 2.0 represent different inflation degrees for the MCL; HCCA n = 2, 3, and 4 represent different step size (n) as described in Figure 2; MCODE (A, B, C, and D) represent degree cutoff, node score cutoff, k-core, and maximum depth, respectively. High modularity values represent better clustering. C, Davies-Bouldin score, or index, for different settings for the HCCA, MCL, k-means, and MCODE. The settings are in accordance with B. Low Davies-Bouldin score represents better clustering. D, ClusterJudge scores of the clustering generated by HCCA, MCL, k-means, and MCODE, respectively. The settings are in accordance with B. High ClusterJudge score represents better clustering.