Source
King's College London BHF Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To investigate the impact of interinstitutional variance (=interobserver variance between institutions) for volumetric and flow cardiac MR (CMR) data and if training on image reading could improve bias.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
In a three-center study, a total of 32 adults with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot and 23 controls underwent CMR using standardized protocols for ventricular volumes/mass (by transverse and short-axis cine-MRI) and pulmonary/aortic blood flow by velocity-encoded MRI (VEC-MRI). Data were analyzed blinded and independently in each institution by experienced readers. Interinstitutional variance was determined before/after training on consented guidelines for image analysis.
RESULTS:
In patients, initial interinstitutional variability of right ventricular parameters was substantial but decreased by training. On transverse planes, variation coefficient for end-diastolic/systolic volumes and ejection fraction decreased from 22%, 19%, and 19% to 7%, 10%, and 8%, respectively (P < 0.025). Left-ventricular variation coefficients improved for end-diastolic and stroke volumes from 8% and 15% to 4% and 6%, respectively (P < 0.007). For short-axis volumetry training resulted in narrowed limits of confidence. Variability did not significantly change in the controls. There was no significant difference between transverse/short-axis MRI. Interinstitutional variance for VEC-MRI in patients/controls was low (<4%).
CONCLUSION:
Interinstitutional variance is an important source of variability in volumetric but not in flow CMR. Such variance can be reduced effectively by consented training.