A, 3H-thymidine incorporation of intimal SMLCs (iSMLC, open bars) and medial SMCs (mSMC, solid bars) stimulated with various chemokines. RANTES, C10, and MARC (CCR1 ligands) induced SMLC but not SMC proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. B, Intracellular Ca2+ influx measurement. Basal fluorescence intensity was subtracted from maximum fluorescence intensity to estimate intracellular Ca2+. Changes in fluorescence intensity were largest in RANTES-treated intimal SMLCs among various CC chemokines. Fluorescence intensities in RANTES-treated, C10-treated, and MARC-treated intimal SMLCs were significantly larger than in medial SMCs (543.2±262.6 in intimal SMLCs, 37.6±19.2 in medial SMCs, P<0.005; 272.2±73.3 in intimal SMLCs, 34.2±33.1 in medial SMCs, P<0.005; and 176.0±46.9 in intimal SMLCs, 31.2±15.3 in medial SMCs, P<0.0005, respectively). MIP-1α – treated and MIP-1γ – treated intimal SMLCs also showed significantly higher calcium influx responses than did medial SMCs (149.4±15.8 in intimal SMLCs, 42.2±20.4 in medial SMCs, P<0.0001; 116.4±34.6 in intimal SMLCs, 16.0±13.2 in medial SMCs, P<0.0003). PDGF-treated intimal SMLCs and medial SMCs showed comparably strong responses (630.4±68.9 in intimal SMLCs, 620.0±156.0 in medial SMCs, P=0.89). C, Migration assay of intimal SMLCs (open bars) and medial SMCs (solid bars) by modified Boyden chamber methods. RANTES induced higher rates of migration of intimal SMLCs than medial SMCs, but negative control, positive control (PDGF), and MIP-1α showed comparable migration rates between intimal SMLCs and medial SMCs. Ctrl indicates control. D, 3H-thymidine incorporation of intimal SMLCs treated with 1 μL/mL anti-CCR3 or anti-CCR5 blocking antibodies or isotype-matched control (ctrl) antibodies followed by stimulation with 100 ng/mL RANTES.