Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Int J Impot Res. 2010 Jan-Feb;22(1):45-50. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

    Clinically meaningful improvement on the quality of erection questionnaire in men with erectile dysfunction.

    Source

    Pfizer, New York, NY, USA.

    Abstract

    Defining the minimal clinically meaningful improvement (MCMI) is crucial to understanding the treatment effects on health-status measures. We estimated the MCMI on the quality of erection questionnaire (QEQ), a validated measure specific to assess erectile quality during sexual intercourse. Data were from two controlled trials of an investigational phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Improvement on the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function was used as the anchor. For men who improved by exactly 1 erectile dysfunction severity category (anchor group (n=95)), clinically meaningful improvement (CMI, estimated with mean QEQ total change score from baseline to end of treatment) and MCMI (estimated with the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval of the mean) were 22.4 (s.d., 2.2) and 18.0 points, respectively. For the difference between the anchor group and men with no change in severity category (n=116), CMI and MCMI were 17.7 (s.d., 2.9) and 12 points, respectively. Distribution-based analyses (baseline s.e. of measurement (s.e.m.)=7.99, end-of-treatment s.e.m.=8.22 and s.e. of difference=11.46) supported a proposed MCMI of 12 points. Convergence of anchor-based and distribution-based criteria supports at least a 12-point difference in QEQ scores between treatments as clinically important.

    PMID:
    19798060
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Nature Publishing Group

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk