Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Perinatol. 2010 Mar;30(3):163-9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.157. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial.

Author information

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. arstark@bcm.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of the study was to examine the variation among institutional review boards (IRBs) in evaluation of the study design of a multicenter trial.

STUDY DESIGN:

We assessed the first written response of local IRBs to each site investigator for a multicenter trial of vitamin A supplementation in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants performed by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Each author of this paper independently reviewed and categorized IRB concerns as major, minor or none, according to the predefined criteria.

RESULT:

Initially, 9 of 18 IRBs withheld approval because of at least one major concern. These concerns reflected difficulties in evaluating specific scientific issues for the design of the trial, including its justification, enrollment criteria, control and experimental therapies, co-interventions, toxicity assessment, outcome monitoring and informed consent.

CONCLUSION:

The difficulty in assessing appropriate trial design for the specific hypothesis under investigation resulted in considerable variability in the evaluation by local IRBs.

PMID:
19798046
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2924664
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk