Warning: The NCBI web site requires JavaScript to function. more...
Generate a file for use with external citation management software.
Sindi A, Herbosa T, Storr J, Ko CY, Kozak LJ, Makary MA, Weiser TG, Barraclough B, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Joseph S, Breizat AH, Merry AF, Herbosa T, Lapitan MC, Donaldson L, Dziekan G, Philip P, Kibatala PL, Sayek I, Darzi LA, Donaldson L, Moorthy K, Berry WR, Gawande AA, Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Dellinger EP, Makary MA, Beavis V, Edwards K, Civil I, Vats A, Meghrajani C, Kolios-Morris V, Bell R, Slack J.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Public health surveillance relies on standardised metrics to evaluate disease burden and health system performance. Such metrics have not been developed for surgical services despite increasing volume, substantial cost, and high rates of death and disability associated with surgery. The Safe Surgery Saves Lives initiative of WHO's Patient Safety Programme has developed standardised public health metrics for surgical care that are applicable worldwide. We assembled an international panel of experts to develop and define metrics for measuring the magnitude and effect of surgical care in a population, while taking into account economic feasibility and practicability. This panel recommended six measures for assessing surgical services at a national level: number of operating rooms, number of operations, number of accredited surgeons, number of accredited anaesthesia professionals, day-of-surgery death ratio, and postoperative in-hospital death ratio. We assessed the feasibility of gathering such statistics at eight diverse hospitals in eight countries and incorporated them into the WHO Guidelines for Safe Surgery, in which methods for data collection, analysis, and reporting are outlined.
Your browsing activity is empty.
Activity recording is turned off.
Turn recording back on