(A) To determine whether enough tags have been sequenced, simulation can be carried out to characterize the fraction of the peaks that would be recovered if a smaller number of tags had been sequenced. In many cases, new statistically significant peaks are discovered at a steady rate with an increasing number of tags (solid curve), i.e., there is no saturation of binding sites. However, when a minimum threshold is imposed for the enrichment ratio between ChIP and input DNA peaks, the rate at which new peaks are discovered slows down (dashed curve). That is, saturation of detected binding sites can occur when sufficiently prominent binding positions are considered. For a given data set, multiple curves corresponding to different thresholds can be examined to identify the threshold at which the curve becomes sufficiently flat to meet the desired saturation criteria (upper right box defined by the red lines). We refer to such threshold as the Minimum Saturation Enrichment Ratio (MSER). MSER can serve as a measure for the depth of sequencing achieved in a data set: A high MSER, for example, indicates that the data set may be under-sampled, as only the more prominent peaks were saturated. See REF Kharchenko et al for details. (B) There are two ways in which a peak can be more statistically significant than another (lower panels compared to upper panels): higher enrichment ratio in ChIP compared to control for the same number of tags (shown under the curve in each case) (lower left) or the same enrichment ratio but a larger number of tag counts (lower right). As the latter case illustrates, there may not be saturation of binding sites when more sequencing leads to less prominent peaks becoming more statistically significant.