Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):566.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.05.049. Epub 2009 Aug 15.

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.

Author information

  • 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare surgical outcomes of patients with symptomatic leiomyomas after robot-assisted ("robotic") or laparoscopic myomectomy.

STUDY DESIGN:

Retrospective chart review of 81 patients undergoing robotic (n=40) or laparoscopic (n=41) myomectomy. Data included fibroid characteristics (number, weight, location, and pathologic findings), operating time, blood loss, complications, and postoperative hospitalization length.

RESULTS:

Patients undergoing laparoscopy had a significantly larger mean uterine size, larger mean size of the largest fibroid, and greater number of fibroids. When adjusted for uterine size and fibroid size and number, no significant differences were noted between robotic vs laparoscopic groups for mean operating time (141 vs 166 minutes), mean blood loss (100 vs 250 mL), intraoperative or postoperative complications (2% vs 20% and 11% vs 17%, respectively), hospital stay more than 2 days (12% vs 23%), readmissions, or symptom resolution.

CONCLUSION:

Short-term surgical outcomes were similar after robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy; long-term outcomes were not assessed.

Comment in

PMID:
19683685
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk