Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Nov;467(11):2807-12. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0986-4. Epub 2009 Aug 4.

Compressive osseointegration of tibial implants in primary cancer reconstruction.

Author information

  • Orthopaedic Oncology Service, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94115-1939, USA. odonnelr@orthosurg.ucsf.edu

Abstract

Compressive osseointegration technology, which provides immediate, mechanically compliant endoprosthetic fixation, has been adapted for massive proximal tibial reconstructions in an attempt to avoid aseptic failure encountered with conventional stems. A retrospective review of 16 patients with resected tumors was undertaken to determine whether compressive osseointegration can provide durable anchorage of tibial implants. Medical records, radiographs, and clinical examinations were reviewed to assess surgical, local disease control, and prosthetic outcomes. The average age was 18 years (range, 12-42 years). Diagnoses included osteosarcoma (12), Ewing sarcoma (two), chondrosarcoma (one), and undifferentiated sarcoma (one). Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 4.5 years; range, 2-10.3 years); no patient was lost to followup. There were no local recurrences. Four patients developed metastatic disease; one patient died of his primary tumor, and another died from a chemotherapy-related malignancy. Complications included one early deep infection that ultimately resulted in prosthetic loosening and the need for an above-knee amputation. There were two late deep infections; prosthetic retention was achieved with débridement and antibiotics. One patient developed aseptic loosening and underwent revision; the other 15 implants provided stable osseointegration at last followup. Compressive osseointegration technology can thus achieve acceptable short-term endoprosthetic fixation results and may reduce the risk of aseptic loosening reported with conventional tibial stems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PMID:
19653050
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2758992
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

Fig. 1A–B
Fig. 2A–B
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Springer Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk