Electrostatic potential surfaces at ionic strength of 150 mM: (
A) structure #5; (
B) structure #6. The active site gorge for subunit 3 is indicated by arrow and is used to highlight the correlation between reaction rate and variation in the electrostatic steering force due to structure dynamics. We find from Fig 3
A that

= 2.40 × 10
11 M
−1 min
−1 in structure #5 (
A) and 1.37 × 10
11 M
−1 min
−1 in structure #6 (
B), with the difference accounting for ∼69% of the difference in the overall reaction rate of

= 7.80 × 10
11 M
−1 min
−1 (structure #5) and 6.30 × 10
11 M
−1 min
−1 (structure #6). The

values calculated with the neutral ACh are reversed, being 1.30 × 10
11 M
−1 min
−1 and 1.50 ± 10
11 M
−1 min
−1 for structures #5 and 6, respectively. The higher rate coefficient in structure #5 is entirely due to the stronger electrostatic effect, as can be seen from the relative intensities of the negative electrostatic potentials in panels
A and
B.