The role of abdominal radiography in the diagnosis of intussusception when interpreted by pediatric emergency physicians

J Pediatr. 2009 Oct;155(4):556-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.04.006. Epub 2009 Jun 26.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of abdominal x-rays in the diagnosis of intussusception when interpreted by pediatric emergency physicians.

Study design: This was a prospective experimental study. Participants were board-certified/eligible pediatric emergency physicians. They evaluated a module containing radiographs of 50 cases of intussusception and 50 controls, matched for age and sex. For each x-ray, the physicians stated whether the x-ray increased, decreased or did not affect suspicion of intussusception. The primary outcome was the percentage of cases for which physicians stated that the x-ray increased their level of suspicion (sensitivity). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of false-negative results and specificity.

Results: Fourteen of 15 eligible physicians participated in the study. Overall, abdominal radiography increased the index of suspicion of intussusception in 48% of cases (sensitivity) and 21% of controls; however, in 11% of cases, the abdominal x-rays were incorrectly interpreted as being reassuring. The specificity was 21%. The radiographs were deemed equivocal for 41% of cases and 58% of controls.

Conclusions: Abdominal x-rays have a low sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing intussusception when interpreted by pediatric emergency physicians.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Child
  • Clinical Competence
  • Emergency Service, Hospital*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intussusception / diagnosis*
  • Male
  • Pediatrics*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiography, Abdominal*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sensitivity and Specificity