Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Forensic Nurs. 2009;5(2):89-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2009.01039.x.

Nobility in objectivity: A prosecutor's case for neutrality in forensic nursing.

Author information

  • Sex Offender Management Unit, New York State Office of the Attorney General, New York, New York 10019, USA. Roger.canaff@oag.state.ny.us

Abstract

This article describes the three primary functions that Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) provide to the judicial process from a prosecutor's perspective. These three functions include comfort and care of patients complaining of sexual assault, competent and consistent evidence collection, and expert testimony on anatomy and tissue. The article makes the argument that all three of these functions are conducted more effectively when the SANE maintains her objectivity and neutrality as a medical and scientific professional. Finally, a recent Supreme Court ruling, Crawford v. Washington, might greatly affect a SANE's ability to repeat hearsay statements made to her by patients who become unavailable to testify. The article will discuss the impact of this case, as it relates to the SANE's function as an expert witness and the issue of hearsay admissibility.

PMID:
19538653
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk