Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
BMJ. 2009 Jun 9;338:b1959. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1959.

Community involvement in dengue vector control: cluster randomised trial.

Author information

  • 1Epidemiology and Disease Control Unit, Public Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nationalestraat 155, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium. vvanlerberghe@itg.be

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the effectiveness of an integrated community based environmental management strategy to control Aedes aegypti, the vector of dengue, compared with a routine strategy.

DESIGN:

Cluster randomised trial.

SETTING:

Guantanamo, Cuba.

PARTICIPANTS:

32 circumscriptions (around 2000 inhabitants each).

INTERVENTIONS:

The circumscriptions were randomly allocated to control clusters (n=16) comprising routine Aedes control programme (entomological surveillance, source reduction, selective adulticiding, and health education) and to intervention clusters (n=16) comprising the routine Aedes control programme combined with a community based environmental management approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

The primary outcome was levels of Aedes infestation: house index (number of houses positive for at least one container with immature stages of Ae aegypti per 100 inspected houses), Breteau index (number of containers positive for immature stages of Ae aegypti per 100 inspected houses), and the pupae per inhabitant statistic (number of Ae aegypti pupae per inhabitant).

RESULTS:

All clusters were subjected to the intended intervention; all completed the study protocol up to February 2006 and all were included in the analysis. At baseline the Aedes infestation levels were comparable between intervention and control clusters: house index 0.25% v 0.20%, pupae per inhabitant 0.44x10(-3) v 0.29x10(-3). At the end of the intervention these indices were significantly lower in the intervention clusters: rate ratio for house indices 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.27 to 0.88) and rate ratio for pupae per inhabitant 0.27 (0.09 to 0.76).

CONCLUSION:

A community based environmental management embedded in a routine control programme was effective at reducing levels of Aedes infestation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN88405796.

Comment in

PMID:
19509031
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2694260
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk