Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;50(8):881-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02098.x. Epub 2009 Jun 5.

Goals, intentions and mental states: challenges for theories of autism.

Author information

  • School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. antonia.hamilton@nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

The ability to understand the goals and intentions behind other people's actions is central to many social interactions. Given the profound social difficulties seen in autism, we might expect goal understanding to be impaired in these individuals. Two influential theories, the 'broken mirror' theory and the mentalising theory, can both predict this result. However, a review of the current data provides little empirical support for goal understanding difficulties; several studies demonstrate normal performance by autistic children on tasks requiring the understanding of goals or intentions. I suggest that this conclusion forces us to reject the basic broken mirror theory and to re-evaluate the breadth of the mentalising theory. More subtle theories which distinguish between different types of mirroring and different types of mentalising may be able to account for the present data, and further research is required to test and refine these theories.

PMID:
19508497
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk