Abstract

Saccadic reaction time (SRT) to a visual stimulus tends to be faster when an auditory and/or somatosensory stimulus is presented in close temporal or spatial proximity, even when participants are instructed to ignore the accessory input (focused attention task). The time course of SRT as a function of stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) is consistent with the time-window-of-integration (TWIN) model assuming a peripheral stage of parallel processing in separate sensory channels followed by a secondary stage of multisensory integration. TWIN has been shown to account for effects of the spatial configuration of the stimuli, for the effect of increasing the number of nontargets presented together with the target, for a possible warning effect of the nontarget, for effects of increasing the intensity of the nontarget, and for the effect of background noise on multisensory integration. Moreover, it has been able to accommodate some effects of aging on multisensory integration. There is empirical support for TWIN's tenet of the separability between spatial and temporal factors on multisensory integration. Besides presenting many features of TWIN within the context of crossmodal interaction modeling efforts, some possible directions on how the TWIN framework could serve to elucidate the link between perception and action are shown.