Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.004. Epub 2009 May 21.

Meta-analysis: a practical decision making tool for surgeons.

Author information

  • 1National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA), London, United Kingdom. sukhmeet.panesar@npsa.nhs.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The exponential rise in published medical research on a yearly basis demands a method to summarise best evidence towards its application to patient care in clinical practice. A robust meta-analysis is a valid tool. It is often considered to be a simple process of pooling results from different studies. This is not true. It appears that surgeons lack a reference guide to help them conduct and appraise a meta-analysis.

METHODS:

This paper provides a structural framework to perform a meta-analysis. It guides the surgeon on a journey from identification of the correct clinical question to data analysis and through to producing a structured report. Statistical methods are discussed briefly as most commercial software calculates most results in the background. An example of a recent meta-analysis is given. However, important caveats are mentioned as there are limitations of the meta-analytical technique.

CONCLUSION:

Whereas meta-analyses of homogeneous studies are the highest form of evidence, poorly conducted meta-analyses create confusion and serve to harm the patient. Surgeons practising their art in an era of evidence-based surgery need to understand the principles of meta-analyses.

PMID:
19464394
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk