Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):426-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01372.x. Epub 2009 Mar 10.

Early intervention in patients at ultra high risk of psychosis: benefits and risks.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.b.dekoning@amc.uva.nl

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Prediction of transition to psychosis in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia has raised interest in intervention prior to the onset of frank psychosis. The aim of this review was to examine whether interventions in the prodromal phase have a favourable benefit/risk ratio.

METHOD:

A literature search in PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO was performed.

RESULTS:

Three randomized clinical trials with antipsychotic medication and/or cognitive behavioural therapy as clinical intervention suggested a positive effect at the end of treatment, but no significant differences were found at the end of follow-up periods from 1 to 4 years. Naturalistic studies present a hypothesis about a possible preventive effect of antidepressive medication. The results of eight other studies are more difficult to interpret. Side-effects of antipsychotic medication and non-adherence with medication are essential problems.

CONCLUSION:

At the present time, the data concerning the benefits and risks do not justify prodromal intervention as standard clinical practice.

PMID:
19392813
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk